
January 2017 – as one of his final acts in office, President Obama yesterday commuted the 35-year prison sentence of Chelsea Manning down to just four years with a scheduled release date of 17 May 2017. For supporters, it must have been an unbelievable victory, and for her critics, an outrage. For those that have known her, there’s an added dimension of anecdotes, personal interactions, and concrete memories of her conduct, all of which color the quality of that commutation. She is a hero to some, a traitor to others. Either she was an idealistic do-gooder who was intent on revealing state-sponsored human rights violations while exposing the darkest corners of the U.S. Government, or she was a coward suffering delusions of grandeur who invented enemies to blame, lashed out at her own country, and revealed nothing but her own self-sponsored narcissism. Which one is accurate? Let me tell you a story.
In the Manning saga, the debate has always been over her state of mind leading up to and during the theft and dissemination of that classified information. There is no debate regarding the basic facts of what she did and what was done with her. During her 2009-2010 deployment to Iraq, she stole diplomatic cables, daily intelligence reports, and combat footage; she fed that information to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks, then separately admitted to as much to a grey-hat hacker named Adrian Lamo, who in-turn contacted U.S. Army Counterintelligence. She was convicted in 2013 on 17 original charges and four more amended charges, including violating the Espionage Act, for her role in illegally disclosing over 700,000 pages of classified documents. To date, Manning has been tried, convicted, imprisoned, and as of yesterday, scheduled for release.
As such, Manning has been a specter in the background of the Obama presidency and a central figure in national debates about everything from Iraq War policy, to the security practices of the Intelligence Community, to the weaponization of information, all the way to conversations about how the LGBTQ community is treated both in and outside the military. Likely few-to-none would have predicted such an unassuming person would be at the center of so much controversy. That is, unless you met her when she first joined the Army and she started down a trajectory toward infamy. In hindsight, maybe it was obvious.
Chelsea Manning and I enlisted in the U.S. Army during the Surge in the fall of 2007 and attended the same U.S. Army Basic Combat Training (BCT) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. As new recruits, we were assigned to Charlie Company, 82d Chemical Battalion, 3d Chemical Brigade. Training began 12 OCT and for me, it ended 14 DEC. For Manning, however, graduation from Charlie Company never came. Her problems began the moment she arrived on station.
During Reception and Integration, Drill Sergeants conducted what is known as “the Shark Attack”: the company’s entire Drill Sergeant cadre descends on a busload of new recruits to welcome them to their home for the next nine weeks. It is intense and it is intentionally disorienting. If the recruit displays any emotion, non-verbal reaction, or any appearance of weakness, they will immediately receive the unrelenting attention of the Cadre. They probe for mental weakness and emotional triggers, assessing who will likely need the most shaping, molding, and mentoring. To ensure sufficient stress during this event, our Cadre’s Shark Attack was enabled by a simple instruction: hold your duffel bag in front of your face. Do not let it drop below your eyes.
Every recruit had the same packing list with the same items in that green duffel bag. They all weighed the same amount. Whether you were 6’4” or 5’4”, male or female, all recruits had to carry their own weight. Understand, that no one breezes through this exercise – everybody hurts, everyone drops their bag at least once, and everyone pays the price for it, including myself. During this exercise, Manning’s problem wasn’t that she was too small or not strong enough. The problem was, she quit. As the rest of the platoon faced one way, gritting their teeth and baring it, whispering words of encouragement to each other, she stood at an about-face the opposite direction, and said she simply could not pick up her own bag.
—–
After the first day, lights came on promptly at 04:20AM every morning, accompanied by the booming voice of a Drill Sergeant blasting through the intercom system, announcing the uniform of the day. By 04:30 we were expected to have bunks made, personal hygiene conducted (clean shaven, teeth brushed, pit stick applied, etc.), wall lockers secured, and already be outside, in formation, waiting for the Drill Sergeants to initiate Accountability Report and then Physical Training (PT).
No one could accomplish all of those tasks in ten minutes. Therefore as a matter of custom everyone woke up at 04:00AM and silently conducted their business in the dark. At 04:20 when the uniform of the day was put out, half the company would be conducting personal hygiene in the latrine area where the intercom system was too faint to hear. Everyone knew that if you heard the uniform of the day, you repeated it to everyone you saw – you shouted it out. It was a team effort to achieve uniformity, because if even one person was in the wrong uniform, then the entire group was at fault. Faulty uniforms meant poor communication; poor communication indicated a lack of discipline. Undisciplined Soldiers are like nails sticking up from a wooden board: they must be hammered down.
One morning at formation there was an audible rumble on the other side of the PT pad in Manning’s direction virtually as the Drill Sergeants were walking up and long after anyone should have even been whispering. What was going on? According to most, the general story went: Manning called out the uniform of the day, waited until her squad was dressed and had moved out to the morning formation, when she then put on the real, correct uniform of the day and ran to catch up. The commotion at the formation was her saying that she heard at the last minute what the real uniform was and it wasn’t her fault they were wrong; the rest of the team apparently was having none of it. In the Army, if everyone is wrong together, then they’re still right; uniformity is one of the highest virtues in our military. If one person is technically “right” but the rest of the team is uniformly wrong, then the technically “right” person is still wrong; everyone is still punished equally. By week two everybody knew that, lived it and lived with it. Everyone, except Manning.
—–
For the trainees of Charlie 82d, the sound of Chelsea Manning’s voice may forever elicit the two words so commonly overheard from her during her six weeks: “I can’t.” In our comparison of memories over the years, fellow recruits in C Co. have confirmed for me: when the going got tough, Chelsea said, “I can’t.”
The first time I heard her say it, it was during Jerry Can training. A common physical exercise used by the Drill Sergeants during the first three weeks of training to correct a deficiency was aerobic and anaerobic work while holding a five-gallon Jerry Can of water. Pushups. Sit-ups. Overhead military presses and squats. Any exercise you could do with body weight, we did with 5-Gallon jugs of water. If a recruit thought no one would notice and emptied out their jug to lighten their load, then the Cadre would order another recruit to carry two jugs. Selfish acts which caused others to suffer were dealt with swiftly within the platoons.
A typical exercise sequence bear-hugging the Jerry Cans always started slowly, but rapidly escalated:
“Run in place. Now on your face. Now roll on your back. Stand up. Faster. Move like your hair is on fire, and the only way to put it out is go faster! “Run in place, on your face, on your back, Faster! “Runinplace,onyourface,onyourback. Faster!”
I remember Manning during one of these exercises, because she was struggling. We had to hold the Jerry Can over our heads, arms fully extended and locked at the elbows while we did squats, in cadence, counting from 1 to 10. If we made it to ten, the exercise was over. However, if a recruit got out of sequence and stood when s/he should have been squatting, we started over at 1. If a recruit dropped the can, we started over at 1. If we didn’t all count together, we started over at 1. Manning couldn’t hold the can and do the exercise, but the truth was, nobody could. The purpose never really was to get to 10. It was to inoculate you to stress and to teach you to never quit, no matter how much it hurt or how hopeless even the simplest group-task had become. When the Drill Sergeants finally reduced the goal to a 5 count, and then 3, and then to a 1-count held for just 10 seconds by everyone in unison, they let us stop. That is, everyone who had tried their hardest. A handful needed additional motivation and had to keep going. The Drill Sergeants, as intense yet consummate professionals, circled around Manning and matter-of-factly laid out the task, “get it over your head now!” It was the rest of the recruits in the group who saw this and told Manning, “C’mon, don’t quit. You’ve got this. C’mon Manning, you can do it.” And then, in that most Soldierly of acts, a handful said “Here, we’ll do it with you. We’ll do it together.” Her immediate battle buddies picked up their jugs and stood around her, doing more of the exercise, trying to coordinate with and motivate her. I remember watching with the rest of the group. She never made eye contact with any of them. There was no connection to the people trying to help her. Instead, I saw her face turned scarlet, sweat pouring off her face, grimacing. And through grit teeth, she moaned in agony, “I can’t,” and she dropped her Jerry Can.
—–
The sheer amount of physical work we did every day meant chow time was sacred. We had to march in lock step into the Dining Facility, secure our trays, keep head and eyes straight forward, elbows locked to the rear and backs straight. We had to keep communication with the kitchen serving staff short, crisp, and quiet, then move out to our tables. The Drill Sergeants waited for every chair at the table benches to have a recruit behind it, all still standing at attention, head and eyes straight forward, holding our trays exactly at chest level before they gave the commands:
set down—TRAYS
secure—–CHAIRS
take——-SEATS
“You have two minutes and forty-five seconds. Eat!”
We ate with spoons because forks and knifes took too long. We only picked food that didn’t require chewing anyway. We were entirely silent; no one would dream of talking at moments like that, and besides, we were all too hungry.
“Two minutes and fifteen seconds remaining,” the Drill Sergeants would call out across the building. We swallowed every mouthful with a swig of water so it would go down faster. We knew we’d be near throwing it up in less than 30 minutes, but for that – “one minute and fifteen seconds remaining –” that we still had food, we were happy to eat anything. Our meals were taken at only that Dining Facility, or in the field. Any food taken, consumed, or even found anywhere outside the Dining Facility was considered contraband and would be punished under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Chow time was sacred.
At 10 seconds, the Drill Sergeant would start the countdown. God help you if you were still chewing when the count ran out.
“3. 2. 1. You’re done. You’re done! Spit it out! SPIT IT OUT. YOU ARE DONE WHEN I SAY YOU’RE DONE, DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME.” Everyone understood – Drill Sergeants are not to be messed with. Their rules are laws. You do not cross them, you do not question them, you do not deviate in any way from the norms and behaviors they established way back on day one. Everyone knows that. Except Manning.
After five weeks of this same lock-step script at the Dining Facility, rehearsed the exact same way three times a day, a commotion in the middle of the facility broke everyone away from their food. Manning was standing up, away from her seat, in the middle of an aisle. What the …
Red in the face, coughing and gasping and holding her throat with one hand, Manning gurgled out, “Drill Sergeant, I’m choking. I’m choking, Drill Sergeant. I can’t breathe, I can’t – ” when she reached out a hand, and physically placed that hand on the Drill Sergeant’s forearm.
The earth might as well have split open; a private made physical contact with a Drill Sergeant. Intentionally. In one ferocious movement and a grip of steel, the Drill Sergeant threw Manning’s hand from off his arm and barked,
“Private get your hand OFF ME or I will RIP your arms out of their sockets and I will beat you to DEATH with them. Now SIT DOWN and SHUT UP!”
Manning stopped choking instantly. She put her arms down at her sides, turned away and said, “Drill Sergeant, yes Drill Sergeant, it won’t happen again.” She sat back down, and finished eating.
—–
The last time I saw Manning in person, it was in the Field during a training exercise. I remember that exercise because nearby there was a hold-over recruit from a previous BCT class who had failed his final Army Physical Fitness Test and was always around. He never quite trained with us, but he was always in the field with us wherever we went. He thought he knew the answer to everything, and he thought he was somehow in charge because he had been in the Army nine weeks longer than the rest of us. But what stood out the most about him was that he always had candy. Candy was like food, only worse. It was not allowed to be purchased or kept, consumed – it could not even be mailed in a care package unless there was enough for every member of the platoon to have some (I’ll never forget when Private Platt’s mother sent 42 Butterfinger candy bars in the mail just so her son could have one). Still, everyone knew that the holdover somehow had contraband packages of Snickers Bars and M&Ms all the time. During my basic training cycle, he came under investigation for allegedly offering to exchange packages of candy for sexual favors from the female recruits. His days were numbered, and everybody knew to steer clear of him. That is, everyone but …
At the end of the field exercise, that holdover was walking up to groups of us, offering to sell us candy for $20 a package. We all knew to keep our distance from him – he was untrustworthy, he was in trouble, and he was only going to get you in trouble too if you associated with him. And yet, Chelsea Manning bought a package of M&Ms from him for $20. I remember that scene, because Manning was not quiet about it. She was practically bragging out loud that she had contraband candy. At six weeks into basic training, it just wasn’t worth it, and yet that scene has stayed with me all these years, because for Manning, it somehow was worth it. Maybe by then, she thought she had nothing else to lose.
That was the last time I saw Chelsea Manning in person, in Basic Combat Training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Last anyone in the Company knew, she had been sent to a Discharge Unit out of our Company Area and was going to be separated for “Failure to Adapt.” I graduated in December and moved on to Advanced Individual Training (AIT) for Mandarin Chinese in California. In 2013, I met a Senior, fellow Chinese Linguist at language training class at Fort Bragg, NC who told me he had known Manning in 2008 while they were both at Fort Huachuca, AZ for training. In that same Chinese language class, I spoke to a second Senior Linguist who told me he had met Manning in 2009 in Iraq as he was rotating out of the country, and Manning’s unit was rotating in. I don’t know what it means that you can trace half of Manning’s career in the Army based on which Chinese Linguist was closest to her at the time, but I do know that she’s in the background of nearly every career of every U.S. Army intelligence analyst active in the last decade. Her actions changed fundamental practices in the DoD. Manning altered not only the way we think about information security, authentication and confidentiality, but also about the grave damage posed by the insider threat. Civilians lives may not have been radically affected, but for those in the community, there was Before Manning and there is Since Manning.
—–
The final point which need be made is not about whether the punishment fit the crime, about whether Chelsea Manning’s actions were justified, or whether the leaks endangered lives or saved civil liberties. Those are important, heady issues, but they’ve also been rehearsed and rehashed, debated, plotted, and picketed many times-over since 2010. Instead, the final point which need be made is about the environment in which Chelsea Manning grew up in the military. Its relevant that someone finally speak on the composition of Basic Training classes, Charlie 82d itself and more generally, the Army at large. That characterization is relevant for understanding Manning’s state of mind leading up to and during the theft and leaking of classified national intelligence, and in-turn helps to interpret Manning’s legacy.
Charlie 82d was a non-infantry, Basic Combat Training class composed much the same as all BCT classes, and the same way the Army as a whole is composed: by everybody, and every body-type; every ethnic background, religion, personality, and yes every sexual orientation all filling the ranks. Those variables were distributed across a bell curve of aptitudes, education levels, socio-economic status’ and geographic hometowns. In 2007, the U.S. Army was habitually failing to meet its monthly recruiting goals; the application standards relaxed and a great cross-section of humanity ended up reporting for duty that warm October at Fort Leonard Wood. In the company, there was a 17-year-old who had enlisted with a waiver, and there was: a 42-year-old mother of three who was terrified of needles; a new grandmother to a brand-new infant granddaughter; and a former coffee distributor in South America in his mid-thirties who everyone still called “Grandpa.” One recruit ironically named “Goesforth” went AWOL within 48 hours of arrival, deserted the military, and was never seen again. One recruit in fourth platoon had been homeless before he joined, and another had blown his entire first university semester’s tuition on OxyContin before he dropped out and enlisted. One recruit was a Mexican citizen who was willing to go to Iraq and fight for the United States in exchange for expedited citizenship. Another was a female with dual German/American citizenship who was so short, the German Army wouldn’t take her, so she joined up with the Americans instead. Charlie 82d had dads in their mid-thirties, and it had dads not yet old enough to buy beer. My platoon had a single mom who had been working as an exotic dancer before she raised her right hand and took the oath; another had married young, got divorced and wanted to get as far away from her Ex as possible; she figured the Middle East was probably far enough, but if he tried to find her there, he’d probably just get blown up by an IED – problem solved. Like the Army itself, the Basic Combat Training company into which Chelsea Manning entered had on-hand and present for duty the living, breathing testimonies of virtually every story within the American experience.
Its relevant that Supporters and Critics know the character of Charlie 82d, because meanwhile Chelsea Manning’s defense team and her supporters drew upon a very different picture of life in the military in order to recast the narrative and bolster her defense. Their case for leniency began with establishing sympathy for someone who was purportedly picked on, harassed, and bullied throughout her service in the Military. In a 2011 video produced by the Guardian in which reporters interviewed friends of Manning, a fellow Soldier in the discharge unit with her at Fort Leonard Wood said:
“He was a runt. And by military standards and compared with everyone who was around there – he was a runt. By military standards, “he’s a runt so pick on him”, or “he’s crazy – pick on him”, or “he’s a faggot – pick on him.” The guy took it from every side. He couldn’t please anyone. And he tried. He really did.”
This is where we need to set the record straight, because if you buy the premise that Manning had a heart of gold but was perpetually picked on by bullies anyway, then it’s a foregone conclusion that she had to finally fightback when the time came to face the biggest bully of them all; that when she saw documentation of civil liberties and human rights abuses by an unaccountable government that was terrorizing people who couldn’t fight back, she recognized herself in those victims, and ultimately had no conscionable choice but to expose those documents for the greater good of the meek everywhere.
What holes exist in that premise? These are the facts: Chelsea Manning was timid and small, but she certainly wasn’t the only one. There were dozens of recruits – male and female – in the last cycle of Charlie 82d that autumn who were under 5’4” and couldn’t have weighed more than 140lbs. Some were physically uncoordinated and seemingly had never spent a day outdoors in their entire lives. Others were natural athletes with a killer instinct that always seemed to put them on top, no matter what the challenge. Some had nothing to prove, and some had everything to prove. It wasn’t size, or stature, or speed, or strength, or even the ability to finish all the events that decided how high a recruit could hold her head in the community. That is a fact.
What is not accurate is the false and felonious image of the U.S. military on which the defense of her conduct has been, at its root, predicated: that somehow everyone in her formative years in the military was practically part of a tribe of 6’2”, overly-aggressive Alpha males pumping testosterone out their pores who ganged up on the smallest in the group and tore her apart out of hyper-machismo intolerance; that War is so brutish and nasty, that Warriors too must be. That is simply not accurate. Chelsea Manning wasn’t being picked on at the Shark Attack when the Drill Sergeants said she had to lift her own bag like everyone else, and she said she couldn’t. She wasn’t being picked on when those Soldiers tried to help motivate her to lift the Jerry Can over her head and even picked up their own and did the exercise again, with her, out of solidarity. And when she faked a choking fit in the middle of the Dining Facility, it wasn’t because someone else was tormenting her – she was tormenting herself.
Chelsea Manning was not picked on or harassed because of her gender or identity; she was not bullied because she was small or appeared easily overpowered or dominated. No, Chelsea Manning was ostracized. Because some unknown in her character prevented her from ever truly entering into that covenant of self-sacrifice upon which collective group defense depends, she could not ever satisfactorily contribute to the welfare of the group. In a social schema where the defense of the group becomes the perpetual rationale for why the group should even continue existing, Chelsea Manning either could not or would not sacrifice enough of herself to inspire loyalty among comrades. Soldiers usually adopt these values in reaction to physical and emotional stressors, to the demands of group accountability, and to their dependency on the group for survival. For that reason, by the end of Basic Combat Training most grudges have been put aside, and any rivalries have abated; this happens exactly because Soldiers have by then learned those lessons in loyalty and self-sacrifice. Everybody learns those lessons.
Everybody except …
I could not read this to the end, because “she” is a pure biological lie. Every brave woman that served will not be associated with a fake “she”. This is a man, not a she. He should have been relieved of the duty to serve based on your report, for purely psychological reasons. There is no excuse for his crimes, and he should be in jail. Obama wrote of those warm night with his transvestite nanny his mother left him with at night, that served him cooked dog in one of his autobiographies. That’s why this Section 8 walks the streets, and why real heroes sit in prison for doing their duty with Obama as president.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. Every time I saw the word “she” I cringed and wondered at the motives of this author. To discredit women in the Army? To point out women can’t hack it perhaps? Manning is NOT a female. Manning was Not a female in BCT. Manning was Not a female when he committed these crimes. So I find it both disengenious and deceptive for this author to keep using the term “she”. Also I went to BCT in 2006. I can remember the names of 2 people I was with and only because I kept in touch. This authors memory must be super human to remember all of those details 10 years later. I couldn’t and no one I know could. But thanks for sharing your “story”
LikeLike
I applaud the author’s use of the pronoun “she”. Giving basic respect to a human being should not be conflated with respect for their behavior, and I am pleased to read an article demonstrating the author’s ability to separate the two concepts. As a biological female, it does not bother me that this particular individual lays claim to my gender. It bothers me that our species is still so emotionally unstable that we persist in connecting all societal norms to our genitalia, rather than individual abilities and contributions. I choose to judge people by their actions. And Ms. Manning’s actions have been appalling. The author’s testimony does not surprise me: it is the norm, rather than the exception, that those who conduct themselves as Ms. Manning did are not demonstrating new behavior but are simply following a pre-established pattern. The Intelligence community has acknowledged the existence of (and predisposition towards) these patterns from its inception. Training on the signs of potential insider threat is a regular requirement for every rank and branch of military Intelligence professionals. The very first indicator of an individual’s threat potential is the willingness of that individual to regularly and persistently prioritize their own welfare and comfort over that of their group. In an environment such as Basic Training, that behavior is unforgettable – and it should be considered the most urgent of red flags. Yet, as has happened in the case of Ms. Manning, not every warning will be heeded in time. This article may be passed off as an opinion piece by some, but I would encourage readers to take the author’s point to heart, even if they do not agree with his choice of pronoun: the choices that person makes are the true measure of who that person is… and who they will likely continue to be.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I’m not sure anyone forgets basic military training. I remember the trouble-makers. I think Jay wanted to share his insight into the mind of Bradley, from his own experience. Why did Bradley join the Army with an “I can’t” attitude? Why did he feel compelled to compromise US intelligence? Maybe because he felt that he was an exception? Basic training should weed out those not willing or able to conform to standards, not allow them to slip through the cracks and cause bigger issues later. Clearly Bradley is an exception because, in the end he did get away with what he set out to do. I hope he enjoyed prison and I hope we don’t hear from him again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Huey, great article. Well written, eloquent and to the point. I understand your use of the pronoun ‘she’ because you were eff’d if you used it and eff’d if you didn’t. It was just a matter of which flavor of negative comments you would get, not whether you our not you would get them. Best of luck and it was a pleasure serving with you in the deuce.
LikeLiked by 7 people
“Also I went to BCT in 2006. I can remember the names of 2 people I was with and only because I kept in touch. This authors memory must be super human to remember all of those details 10 years later. I couldn’t and no one I know could. But thanks for sharing your “story””
Well, Nivasi, I went to BCT in 2002, and not only do I remember the names of the people in the immediate bunks to me, I also remember all 4 DSs, where my bunk was in the bay, my squad, platoon, company, bn, etc. I remember the name of the company commander, both 1sgs, and even the daggon training NCO. I remember almost every training event, and even where some of them were on post. Just because YOU cannot remember who you trained with does not mean others can’t either. But I commend you on trying to make yourself out to be better than the author by thanking him for his “story”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
HIS HIS HIS HIS HIS NAME IS BRADLEY NOT CHELSEA HIS HIS HIS HIS HIS HE WAS BORN WITH A SET OF BALLS AND A SWINGING COCK. HE IS A MAN.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The word “she” confused me a couple of times but didn’t prevent me from reading the article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why do you have Spec Rank in BCT?
LikeLike
He is still biologically male and was male at the time of BCT. He’s a traitor who deserves a shallow grave with no marker.
LikeLike
For those who don’t agree with the author referring to Manning as “she”…
IMO…regardless of the authors own personal beliefs on the matter, I think that by referring to Manning as “she” in the article not only solidifies the writers objective stance when divulging first hand experiences, but also lays a credible foundation from their point of view. In other words, by showing respect towards the gender Manning self-refers, the author remains neutral on that subject, inherently relieving themselves from any claims of bias based strictly on that issue.
…in Barney terms — The author don’t care what he/she/it call themselves, here’s what they witnessed, take it or leave it.
Well written article…
LikeLiked by 4 people
The author is part of what’s wrong with the military. Bradley failed at basic and should never have been part of a unit in the first place. And stop calling him “She”. Bradley is and will always be a man no matter what the surgeons do to him.
LikeLike
He was a he, not a she. However saythis I am glad I went through BCTin 1976 as I probably wouldn’t have made in in 2007. I am a woman and do not wantt to be a man. Product of the time.
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing your insight. Somehow hearing about this didn’t surprise me, I always wondered about how her defense team made the tactical decision to badmouth the Army in its last ditch effort to save the traitor from his/her due.
Infantry SGT, 101st
OIF 1 & 3
LikeLike
@BRAD,
Soldiers can enlist as a Specialist if they have a degree. We had several E-4s when I went to basic in 2009.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good article. Thank you for using “she” as it is the correct pronoun for someone who’s gender is female. Sex and gender are separate things and gender is not biological.
I would say that from your report, I’m surprised she was allowed to remain in they army. She seemed to be failing BCT and was obviously always going to be an issue. I would hazard a guess that the recruiting issues were a factor in keeping her, but don’t know for certain, of course.
LikeLike
Brad- You can enlist in the Army with a rank of SPC if you have a college degree.
LikeLike
Bradley Manning (like Bruce Jenner) will never be a “she” to me unless they go all the way with their sex change. Until then, they are just freaks who like to cross-dress.
And, commutation or no, Manning is a traitor. To his nation, to the Army, and to the men and women he served with.
LikeLike
All of this hoopla over what pronoun the author used to refer to Manning is bullshit. The author clearly wanted to make the article about Manning’s inability to conform to Army standards and not leave room for the Manning apologists to open a hyperbolic attack based on the gender question.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Beautifully written, and well done. I made much the same assessments based on the chat logs with Adrian Lamo. You have confirmed every judgment I made about the character of this jerk. Thank you!
LikeLike
Excellent article brother.
LikeLike
Great article, and I’m glad someone who knew ‘her’ from day one of her attempt at serving in the Army finally spoke out about ‘her’ character. I was in Charlie 82D as well, only that was when Charlie was in Ft. McClellan, AL in 1994. ‘Cold Steel Charlie!’
LikeLike
At anonymous saying you couldn’t make it in 2007 however you made it in 1976, I applaud you got that laugh. Things have gotten way easier. You’d soar through it if you made it back then. That’s why I love the old vets. They’re the kings and queens of the badasses lol
LikeLike
Not a Manning fan, but this nobody that wrote this article is a joke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Insomniac Libertarian.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, so many transphobic comments. Decent people refer to others in the masculine, feminine, or gender neutral as each individual identifies. Your opinion on whether or not someone is a “real woman” or “real man” is irrelevant, and is not welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I only got halfway through this and one thought kept repeating in my head: WTF wasn’t this person drummed out of the service if she was so clearly unfit and unwilling to do what is required?
LikeLike
This man invests his own time to write his own opinion, his own insight, his own memory. He can call the sky red and the earth blue… you don’t have to agree with him. But don’t you dare tell him what the hell he can write. Do we not all wear uniforms so that every person can express himself however the hell he feels like? If your opinion is that Manning is a he… who gives a shit? I don’t care if it’s a he or a she and it doesn’t matter at all. The issue is that this bastard betrayed our country and is getting off free? Is that not the issue? Why do people take the big picture and completely let it go in favor or stupid moral arguments that are personal in nature. I happen to feel that Manning is a male too… who cares? What does this change? She could have been born a female and done what she did and still been a traitor that is getting off free. I came here for the Manning story that I didn’t know. And that is exactly what I got. And he can tell it however the fuck he wants to because this is fucking America! SFC B
LikeLiked by 1 person
She never had any business going into the military. Like most kids who join the military, she was probably too immature, undeveloped, and malleable to be fighting for a country whose policy she probably doesn’t understand.
LikeLike
Let me fix this article for you. He. He. He. His. He. He. He. His. His. His. He. He. He. He. His. His. His. His. He. He. His. His. …that is as far as I got reading about this traitor that put HIS fellow soldiers in harms way. Can’t. Stomache. It.
LikeLike
Damn. It took me back to my basic training days. Wow. It was all about never quitting! Why the DS did and said all thoughs things. Good job on the article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another take on the same subject.
http://www.stonekettle.com/2017/01/clemency.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for telling your story. I appreciated reading your perspective as it reveals another aspect of what could have driven Manning’s motivations back then. My own BCT was over 20 years ago and while I do not recall the names of the DSs, my bunk mates or even my battle buddies, unfortunately, I do recall the names of the troublemakers and the people that stood out as not quite fitting in. I noticed that helping you to recall some of the more telling events were the pictures that documented every aspect of training.
(I recall my own surprise at being in so many of our own photos as I didn’t recall seeing a camera during training.)
I feel that among the more egregious actions was the repeated “I CAN’T”.
I can only imagine the progression of reactions from fury to disgust to resignation then disdain and finally indifference, not only among your fellow recruits, but any professional soldier Manning encountered in their short career.
I CAN’T.
It is still phrase I hate to this day. when my child said it, it infuriated me. When my fellow soldiers said it, it galvanized me and when co-workers say it, it confounds me.
It’s been 22 years and I recall getting smoked because the Drill sergeant heard me admonish someone else for her can’t do attitude.
You are right about the standard being different and opening up the military to new stories that may not have otherwise been told inside its ranks. but it still grieves me that the Army felt Manning’s skill as a linguist and analyst outweighed their ability to soldier and be a soldier when it was proven time and again that soldiering wasn’t something Manning could do, even with motivation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good lord stop calling him she. His chromosomes are xy, no matter how many surgeries he has, how mentally ill he is, or how many times the president pardons him, HE is still a HE and HE is a traitor.
LikeLike
From my non-military perspective, it seems like Manning would have been a good candidate for a general discharge. So did that not happen because of the shortage of recruits during a war?
LikeLike
Article shows that Manning was not fit to serve for a number of reasons. As part of training, wouldnt that have blipped and got someone discharged? Any team anywhere can spot the one that doesn’t mesh, doesnt have the will to succeed, and will most likely be the risk to the team and teammates, so as a very important take away, where was the point of failure recognizing this risk and has that point been addressed/corrected as part of current training standards? what happened is done, let’s not leave a gap to repeat it. Regarding gender pronouns, they aren’t important when discussing training and teamwork or attitude. I would have said “he” since at the time the “male” box had been checked during enlistment.
LikeLike
Also wondered — again from my non-military perspective — why Manning continued to have access to classified materials after there were apparently some pretty obvious problems. Is the procedure for pulling security clearances different with the military than with civilians?
LikeLike
In 1959 in basic 208s were a dime a dozen. “could not adapt” Ft. Hood June thru August. Hot and tough, Bradley would have gotten a G.I. party and then a 208.
LikeLike
You should blur the badges and faces of everyone else in that bct book picture. I don’t think they want their information out there because you’re looking for clicks.
LikeLike
You keep saying “she” and “her”.. That is a MAN. No amount of surgery or hormone therapy will EVER change that. Until the day comes when we can literally change our own DNA, EVERYONE on this planet is stuck as a male or female. On a side note..:
I went through Infantry OSUT @ Ft. Benning and we saw quite a few of these types of people. People that thought they didn’t have to follow the rules, as soon as we were made to do anything physical they said they couldn’t, feigned an injury to get out of it, etc. They were real pieces of crap that got everyone else in trouble while they were laughing and cutting it up in the back of the deuce and a half as we were all on a 10, 15 or 25 mile forced march. They would put in just enough work to graduate but these types were the ones that were constantly going to the hospital to get out of PT, field duty, etc.
The only reason these types are allowed to graduate is because they passed all the of physical and mental requirements. We couldn’t stand them because they always had an excuse on why they couldn’t or shouldn’t have to do it. They want to be a part of the Infantry elite and expect to get by with a D- average. I can only hope that our new president puts that punk back into prison, along with bergdahl and all of the others that have gotten people hurt or killed.
LikeLike
As I suspected. The article is really good and helps draw a picture of who was Chelsea Manning and how she ever got in the army, yet half the comments are “OMG WHY DO YOU KEEP CALLING IT ‘SHE’ HURR DURR”
LikeLiked by 1 person
If we had someone like that in my Air Force Basic Training class, he would have been given a General Discharge and sent packing. In fact, one person in my class got exactly that.
That someone with this level of difficulty got a security clearance in the first place is beyond baffling.
LikeLike
He/him/his
LikeLike
Interesting how the discussion immediately turned to the use of the pronoun and has usurped the conversation. The larger issue appears to be an afterthought. Good job, Manning.
Anyways, I did basic in the Canadian military. We also had such recruits — there’s got to be at least one in each platoon. If the system worked, these recruits would have been screened out. Unfortunately, the US was so desperate for bodies even a deviant like Manning was kept. Not even background and psychological screening for a top secret security clearance with special compartmental access weeded this individual out. Our system isn’t any better. We also had a traitor in our midst who is now in prison.
The speaks to the state of the system as a whole, and should raise questions on whether standards should be lowered to allow for quantity over quality of recruits.
LikeLike
Same thing at 35F training. But bodies were more necessary than suitable bodies, so he was passed on through.
LikeLike
Poorly written SHe was a HE when HE joined.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For whatever it’s worth, I went through Air Force Basic Training in 1955, and I still remember many names and events and barracks configurations from that time.
In those days there were enough recruits that we didn’t need to keep anyone who didn’t want to be there or who couldn’t cut the mustard. The Drill Instructors were brutal and unforgiving and did their best to get everyone to quit. Few did. The goal was to see if they could break you in a relatively safe environment so that you didn’t get as far as combat before breaking and endangering the lives of your fellow soldiers. They also wanted you to be tough enough to “take a licking and keep on ticking.”
Today’s military is far different. They have to lower standards in order to get recruits, and then lower training standards to keep them through to graduation and meet quotas. This silliness is not the fault of the military – they are directed by their civilian masters. What was once a training venue for tough, competent soldiers has become an experimental playground for social change and experimentation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I went to Boot Camp at Paris Island in 1997. I switched to the Army in 2001 and went to AIT then. I remember my Squadmates from Boot Camp, I remember my DI’s. I remember my Instructors and Platoon Mates from AIT. I remember most of the people I served with in a direct capacity. Just because you don’t does not mean no one else does.
LikeLike
@tribucks
We had a turd take a swing at the commanding officer during morning PT. He still graduated with my class, as did all the people who were caught with ‘contraband’.
The drill sergeants had no real control. The Army needed bodies and boots on the ground.
@ Jay
Thanks for your service and sacrifice, brother. Very well written.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That all makes perfect sense until you meet someone that was abused at home and lied to by the recruiter.
And that’s gunna end up more common than you think, because not all of those people crack until much later.
LikeLike